Spray attacks vs terrain

Hi all. heres a noob question... can a spray attack firing from outside of a forest hit a target on the other side of the forest? can anyone quote from any official text?

Short answer: no.

References:

Pg 60:

A model under the spray template cannot be hit by the attack if the attacker's line of sight to it is completely blocked by terrain.

pg 88:

When a model outside of a forest attempts to draw a line of sight to another point of a forest, the forest blocks line of sight to anything beyond it. Thus, a model can see 3" into or out of a forest but not completely through one regardless of how thick it is.

And, no; a warbeast is not a terrain regardless if it is made of wood and stones

roffles!

It should still work for a model with eyeless sight. The tricky bit is what happens if u spray a model in a forest (from outside) and the spray spills over to another model behind that Initially targeted model and outside of the forest.

If i'm not mistaken, the 2nd model will not get hit (unless the sprayer has eyeless sight). Will check when i get back home.

gizmoduck wrote:And, no; a warbeast is not a terrain regardless if it is made of wood and stones

Are we referring to the same "so called Circle player" that thinks that Circle construct warbeast is terrain?

Don't worry I think he is special, I don't see anyone else will come out with things like that but I do surprise that do have ppl actually agree with him. Well In this game if its not written in the card then its in the book if its not written both then its not true. Therefore unless u cant read ,if not things like that u wont get it wrong.

jasechew wrote:

gizmoduck wrote:And, no; a warbeast is not a terrain regardless if it is made of wood and stones

Are we referring to the same "so called Circle player" that thinks that Circle construct warbeast is terrain?

What the ???? Since when are constructs terrains? Must be one hell of a construct!?

adiaze wrote:

jasechew wrote:

gizmoduck wrote:And, no; a warbeast is not a terrain regardless if it is made of wood and stones

Are we referring to the same "so called Circle player" that thinks that Circle construct warbeast is terrain?

What the ???? Since when are constructs terrains? Must be one hell of a construct!?

Haha apparently ur fellow circle player and his partner believes its a moving/portable terrain. even there is a big word "warbeast" written on his card. Well how awesome if it works that way.

so if i ignore forest, i can spray larh. example eyeless sight.

polarloon wrote:so if i ignore forest, i can spray larh. example eyeless sight.

Yup if u can see it u can shoot it

Correcto! I love rules. There's always a way to get around it.

polarloon wrote:so if i ignore forest, i can spray larh. example eyeless sight.

Damn Legion and their eyeless sight!!

Well maybe he make terrain from wood and stone. So he think that when the construct were made by the Druids from wood and stones... It is a piece of terrain also.

By that logic, that would also mean that the Pokok caster, Cassius is a terrain. So you cannot spray the pokok caster..... Strong!!! hahahaha. such twisted logics.

adiaze wrote:

polarloon wrote:so if i ignore forest, i can spray larh. example eyeless sight.

Damn Legion and their eyeless sight!!

Correction: "the eye thing"!