WARMACHINE MALAYSIA SUMMER LEAGUE 2011

Next summer 2011 something about to happen.... which it has never happen before.... A chance to prove your skills, strategy, theory, bravery and capabilities to lead an army.

WARMACHINE MALAYSIA SUMMER LEAGUE 2010

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ENTRY FEE: RM5 (paper work and registration charges).

TIME FRAME: 2MONTHS.

ARMY SIZE: FIX 25Points with 2 Warcaster / Warlord of a single faction (WJ/WB bonus follow the lowest among the 2).

FORMAT : LAST MAN STANDING

PAIRING: FLEXISBLE

VENUE: ANYWHERE.

RELEASE DATE: 04 MARCH 2011.


REGISTRATION

Players who wish to participate require registering their name and army at the forum registration

Each player will be given one card. Players are responsible on their own card and keep track of the game they played. There will be no replacement card is given to players who lost their card, He/she will need to play from the start again.
(AND YES those who he/she fought before also require replaying as the previous record no longer valid without both cards)


GAMEPLAY

Play against everyone.
Each match will be best of 3 games.
Players may change caster after each game.
Choose your caster after deciding who starts.(No u don't get to field both caster in case u wander)
(YES, the person who starts 1st choose and deploy then the person who second last choose his caster and deploy)

POINT SYSTEM

Wining : 1pts
Killing Caster : 1Pts
Jack/Beast Kills : 1Pts
Solo Kills : 1Pts
Wipe out units : 1pts
Painted models : 1pts ( so start painting )
No Proxy models : 1pts
(This include conversion which is not up to PP conversion rules standards.
However If your opponent can accept your conversion / proxy u still get the points)


PRIZES
Coming soon stay tune



Coming soon at the forum near you !!

I'm in.

Best of 3, hmmm... Interesting!

Best of 3 - plays up to 3 games and keep only one of ur best game.
(YES u can have 2 winner in this situation a player only lose when he lose all 3 games)
(Both player may choose to stop at second game and choose not to have the 3rd game)

Well is it too many games? I would think both player will have chance to score some point. both players on third game as he/she already seen and knew what both what enemy casters / warlord and army can do.

It will be done via point system , example killing caster , jacks , infantry, solo and winning the game. Therefore if lose still got chance to get higher point then the winner.

Aaaarghh too much pressure! too much pressure!! I feel like West Ham United..

Aaaarghh too much pressure!! too much pressure!! I feel like LIVERPOOL...

Last man standing? Sounds a bit excessive, but I`m in. Time to build up my mercs.

If I finish at the bottom of the table do I get relegated?

Tekanan wrote:Aaaarghh too much pressure!! too much pressure!! I feel like LIVERPOOL...

Don't worry, you'll never walk alone.. Wigan is with you..

Well to give u guys get the reason why is the format last man standing. I shall reveal a bit more regarding the point system. check it out

Wining : 1pts
Killing Caster : 1Pts
Jack/Beast Kills : 1Pts
Solo Kills : 1Pts
Wipe out units : 1pts
Painted models : 1pts ( so start painting )
No Proxy models : 1pts (If your opponent can accept you conversion / proxy u still get the points)

As I said :A chance to prove your skills, strategy, theory, bravery and capabilities to lead an army.

Its a battle which need u take out all enemy models with minimum casualties only is consider the actual wining.Wining might even get less points then losing.

I`m a bit worried about the last man standing thing. It favours armies with fewer models and heavy armour. It also penalises assassination tactics.

Maybe you could fix it by making a win count for more points? Currently it stands at a win will give you 2 points. 1 for the win and 1 for the caster kill. Maybe make it 3 points for the win and none for the caster kill? That would give people more incentive to win.

[Ghost] wrote:I`m a bit worried about the last man standing thing. It favours armies with fewer models and heavy armour. It also penalises assassination tactics.

Maybe you could fix it by making a win count for more points? Currently it stands at a win will give you 2 points. 1 for the win and 1 for the caster kill. Maybe make it 3 points for the win and none for the caster kill? That would give people more incentive to win.

Its 25points few heavy model list will other get swarm or assassinated. Regarding assassination tactics it still rocks u basically shut down his battle group even u don't win instantly .

Well If I believe if I put win/caster kill higher points instead people who always win will win and newbie wont have a chance at all to catch up at all. Furthermore killing caster not necessary win u games sometimes u fought against some stupid undead swamp list or some khador pretty boy military maniac taking down their caster dont really stop them. At the end as I said its bout taking enemy force with minimal casualties.

Its a different play style all together. Well I would suggest a try run maybe next week then we shall see from there.

Sounds good to me. Thanks for clarifying.

Another question though, before I run off and buy another caster, does the army fielded have to be the same for both casters?

Yes Its same list 2 caster the other caster mainly for change of pace or meta

[Ghost] wrote:Sounds good to me. Thanks for clarifying.

Another question though, before I run off and buy another caster, does the army fielded have to be the same for both casters?

Omg who? Who? Fiona? Dun get ashlynn or bart or shae. Very cliche la those ppl

I agree with last man standing, it will create alternative thinking instead of the usual bum rush kill caster. I do suggest to run a casual / tourney / match / meet up that uses this point system, that would give everyone time to adjust to it.